In Shalabi v. City of Fontana, published May 21, 2019, the Fourth District Court of Appeal, Division 2 reversed a judgment against the plaintiff after a bench trial. The plaintiff sued a police officer under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for allegedly wrongfully shooting and killing the plaintiff's father when plaintiff was a minor. The plaintiff turned 18 on December 3, 2011. He filed his complaint on December 3, 2013. The court held a bench trial on stipulated facts on the issue of whether the complaint was filed within the statute of limitations. It concluded that the last day to file the suit was December 2, 2013, and that the lawsuit was time-barred.
The appellate court ruled that the trial court calculated the last day to file incorrectly. Under section 1983, California's statute of limitations for personal injury actions--two years--applies. California law controls the tolling of that statute of limitations. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 352, a minor's cause of action is tolled until the minor turns 18. The statute begins running on the minor's 18th birthday. The two methods of calculating the statute of limitations after the tolling period ended are the anniversary method and the calendar method. The trial court used the calendar method. Under Code of Civil Procedure section 12, however, California law uses the anniversary method, under which the first day of the period is excluded and the last day is included. Since the plaintiff's birthday on December 3, 2011 was the triggering date, that day is excluded, and the count starts with December 4. Two calendar years from that date is December 3, 2013. That date is included. So the last day to file was December 3, 2013. An 1884 California Supreme Court case held that the first day is counted, because the plaintiff has the entire first day of majority to file suit. That case did not address section 12, and so is not binding authority on section 12's application.
Comments